Grim reapers have recently been employed in an argument against an infinite past. I’d like to see if grim reapers may similarly be employed in an argument against uncaused beginnings.
I want to give this argument in part to provoke a bit of discussion of the role of FOL in philosophy. Though, I don’t think the argument carries great weight.
Let ‘w’ refer to any world. Then “exists in” expresses a perfectly fine relation between entities and worlds. Let S be the set of worlds in which history ends in 30 BC.
I will argue from the fact that some rational persons enjoy eternal bliss to universalism. My conclusion is that necessarily, universalism is true.
Suppose there is a perfect being, God—a being maximal in power, knowledge, and goodness. Then this being will likely save, i.e. restore relationship with, everyone (all humans) eventually because
Recent Comments